Investment strategies have evolved dramatically over the past decade, moving beyond the traditional 60/40 equity-bond portfolio to encompass a much wider range of asset classes. As market dynamics become increasingly complex and correlations between traditional assets shift, sophisticated investors are embracing multi-asset diversification strategies that include physical and alternative assets alongside equities and fixed income.
In this comprehensive guide, I'll explore the benefits of strategic asset diversification, with particular emphasis on the role of physical assets in creating resilient portfolios that can weather various economic conditions.
The Evolution of Investment Diversification
Let's trace the evolution of portfolio diversification approaches over time:
First Generation: Basic Stock and Bond Allocation
Traditional portfolio construction relied primarily on allocating between stocks and bonds. The conventional wisdom centered on a 60/40 allocation - 60% in stocks for growth potential and 40% in bonds for stability and income generation. This diversification method leveraged the historically inverse correlation between stocks and bonds, aiming to deliver moderate growth while reducing overall portfolio volatility.
However, this approach demonstrated significant limitations over time:
- Increased correlation between stocks and bonds during certain market conditions
- Limited protection against inflation
- Vulnerability to systemic market events
- Reduced bond yields in the low interest rate environment
- Susceptibility to simultaneous stock and bond drawdowns
- Correlation breakdown during financial crises
Second Generation: Addition of Global Assets
To enhance diversification, investors expanded into international markets with allocations spread across multiple geographies. A typical global portfolio might allocate 40% to domestic stocks, 15% to developed international markets, 5% to emerging markets, 30% to domestic bonds, and 10% to international bonds. This approach sought to capitalize on economic cycle differences between regions and reduce the impact of domestic economic fluctuations.
Global diversification provided several benefits:
- Exposure to faster-growing economies
- Reduced impact of domestic economic cycles
- Access to different sector compositions
- Enhanced return potential through regional arbitrage
However, globalization has increased cross-border correlations, partially eroding these benefits during global market events. Additionally, investors faced new challenges including currency risk exposure and the reality that all portfolios remained heavily dependent on financial assets.
Third Generation: Multi-Asset Diversification
Modern portfolio theory has evolved to incorporate a much broader range of assets, creating truly diversified portfolios across multiple dimensions. A sophisticated multi-asset portfolio might include:
Traditional Assets:
- 30% Domestic equities
- 15% International equities
- 15% Government bonds
- 10% Corporate bonds
- 5% Inflation-protected securities
Alternative Assets:
- 10% Real estate investments
- 5% Commodities exposure
- 5% Private equity allocations
- 5% Infrastructure investments
This more sophisticated approach delivers several advantages:
- Exposure to different economic drivers and risk factors
- Improved inflation protection
- Access to illiquidity premiums
- Reduced overall portfolio volatility while maintaining return targets
- Enhanced risk-adjusted returns across various economic scenarios
Understanding Asset Class Characteristics
Each asset class responds differently to economic conditions, which is the fundamental reason diversification works:

Let's examine the key characteristics of major asset classes:
Equities (Stocks)
Return Drivers:
- Corporate earnings growth
- Valuation multiple expansion
- Dividend yield
Risk Factors:
- Market volatility
- Economic cycle sensitivity
- Sector concentration risk
Performance Across Economic Scenarios:
- Economic Growth: Typically strong performance
- Inflation: Mixed results depending on inflation rate and corporate pricing power
- Recession: Usually negative, particularly for cyclical sectors
- Deflation: Generally negative except for certain defensive sectors
Key Characteristics:
- Liquidity: High for public markets
- Income Generation: Moderate through dividends
- Capital Appreciation: High potential over long-term horizons
Fixed Income (Bonds)
Return Drivers:
- Interest income payments
- Price changes from interest rate movements
- Credit spread changes
Risk Factors:
- Interest rate risk
- Credit default risk
- Inflation eroding real returns
Performance Across Economic Scenarios:
- Economic Growth: Moderate returns from income
- Inflation: Negative, especially for longer duration bonds
- Recession: Typically positive, especially government bonds
- Deflation: Strong performance, particularly long duration
Key Characteristics:
- Liquidity: Moderate to high depending on type
- Income Generation: High, primary return component
- Capital Appreciation: Limited except in falling rate environments
Real Estate
Return Drivers:
- Rental income from tenants
- Property value appreciation
- Development and repositioning gains
Risk Factors:
- Location-specific risks
- Tenant default risk
- Illiquidity during market stress
- Regulatory and tax changes
Performance Across Economic Scenarios:
- Economic Growth: Typically positive with increased demand
- Inflation: Historically strong hedge via rent increases
- Recession: Negative but with significant sector variation
- Deflation: Negative, especially with high leverage
Key Characteristics:
- Liquidity: Low for direct ownership, moderate for REITs
- Income Generation: High through rental income
- Capital Appreciation: Moderate to high, location dependent
Commodities
Return Drivers:
- Supply and demand dynamics
- Production costs
- Currency movements
- Geopolitical events
Risk Factors:
- High volatility
- Cyclical demand patterns
- Storage and roll costs for futures
- No intrinsic yield
Performance Across Economic Scenarios:
- Economic Growth: Typically positive, especially industrial metals
- Inflation: Strong historical hedge, particularly precious metals
- Recession: Usually negative except gold in certain scenarios
- Deflation: Generally negative across most commodities
Key Characteristics:
- Liquidity: High for futures markets
- Income Generation: None - costs instead for physical storage
- Capital Appreciation: Cyclical with high volatility
Alternative Investments
Private Equity:
- Return Drivers: Operational improvements, leverage, and multiple expansion
- Risk Factors: High illiquidity and company-specific risks
- Typical Returns: Higher than public markets with illiquidity premium
Infrastructure:
- Return Drivers: Contracted cashflows and monopolistic positions
- Risk Factors: Regulatory changes, political risk, long time horizons
- Typical Returns: Stable inflation-linked income with moderate appreciation
Collectibles:
- Return Drivers: Scarcity, historical significance, and condition
- Risk Factors: Authenticity verification, preservation, market liquidity
- Typical Returns: Highly variable, potentially uncorrelated with traditional assets
Digital Assets:
- Return Drivers: Adoption rates, scarcity, and technological utility
- Risk Factors: Regulatory uncertainty and technological obsolescence
- Typical Returns: Extreme volatility with asymmetric upside potential
The Case for Physical Assets in a Diversified Portfolio
Physical assets offer unique advantages that make them valuable components in a diversified portfolio:
- Treat all physical assets as a single category
- Ignore ongoing maintenance and management requirements
- Underestimate liquidity constraints during market stress
- Diversify across different types of physical assets
- Account for all costs including management, insurance, and taxes
- Structure investments with liquidity needs in mind
Inflation Protection
One of the most compelling reasons to include physical assets is their inflation protection. Historical analysis from 1970-2022, including high inflation periods, reveals distinct performance patterns:
Asset Performance During Inflation:
- Stocks: Negative real returns during high inflation in short-term
- Bonds: Significantly negative real returns during inflation
- Real Estate: Positive real returns after adjustment period
- Commodities: Strongest positive correlation with inflation spikes
- Infrastructure: Positive performance with inflation-linked revenue structures
- Fine Art: Maintained value during inflation historically
Protection Mechanisms:
- Real Estate: Ability to increase rents as replacement costs rise
- Commodities: Direct link to price levels and increased production costs
- Infrastructure: Regulated returns often tied to inflation measures
- Collectibles: Scarcity value and wealth preservation function
A pension fund that maintained a 20% allocation to real assets during the 2021-2022 inflation spike outperformed peers by 3.7 percentage points, primarily due to strong performance from real estate, infrastructure, and commodity holdings.
Low Correlation Benefits
Physical assets often have lower correlation with traditional financial markets. The following correlation analysis from 2010-2022 demonstrates how different assets move in relation to U.S. stocks:
| Asset Class | Correlation with U.S. Stocks |
|---|---|
| U.S. Bonds | 0.2 |
| International Stocks | 0.85 |
| Residential Real Estate | 0.4 |
| Commercial Real Estate | 0.5 |
| Gold | 0.1 |
| Commodities | 0.3 |
| Fine Art | 0.2 |
| Infrastructure | 0.6 |
During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, these correlations shifted notably:
| Asset Class | Crisis Correlation with U.S. Stocks |
|---|---|
| U.S. Bonds | -0.3 (flight to safety effect) |
| International Stocks | 0.95 (high correlation during crisis) |
| Residential Real Estate | 0.7 (higher correlation in crisis) |
| Commercial Real Estate | 0.8 (higher correlation in crisis) |
| Gold | -0.4 (negative correlation during flight to safety) |
| Commodities | 0.6 (higher during liquidity crunch) |
| Fine Art | 0.3 (lower correlation maintained) |
| Infrastructure | 0.7 (higher but still diversifying) |
This data illustrates how correlations can shift during market stress, but certain physical assets maintain their diversification benefits even during crises.
A family office that maintained a 30% allocation to physical assets (real estate, precious metals, and art) during the 2008 financial crisis limited their portfolio drawdown to 19% compared to a 38% decline for a traditional 60/40 portfolio.
Long-Term Value Preservation
Physical assets have demonstrated remarkable value preservation over long time horizons. Analysis spanning 1900-2022, including wars, depressions, and monetary changes, reveals the following inflation-adjusted annual returns:
| Asset Class | Average Annual Real Return | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Global Stocks | 5.3% | Multiple 90%+ drawdowns |
| Global Bonds | 1.8% | Extended negative periods |
| Residential Real Estate | 3.1% | Lower volatility |
| Commercial Real Estate | 4.2% | Cyclical patterns |
| Gold | 0.7% | Protection during monetary crises |
| Farmland | 4.1% | Lowest annual volatility |
| Fine Art (top segments) | 3.9% | Generational preservation |
Preservation Qualities of Physical Assets:
- Tangibility: Intrinsic value independent of financial system
- Utility: Provides essential services regardless of economic conditions
- Scarcity: Limited supply characteristics, particularly land and collectibles
- Adaptability: Can be repurposed to meet changing economic needs
A multi-generational family wealth study found that families who maintained at least 25% of their assets in physical form (particularly land, commercial real estate, and private businesses) had significantly higher wealth retention across generations than those exclusively invested in financial assets.
Income Generation with Growth Potential
Many physical assets provide stable income while retaining growth potential:

This dual characteristic is particularly valuable for investors seeking both cash flow and long-term appreciation:
| Asset Type | Annual Income | Annual Growth | Total Expected Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multifamily Real Estate | 3-5% | 2-3% | 5-8% (plus tax advantages) |
| Commercial Real Estate | 4-6% | 1-3% | 6-9% (sector variation) |
| Infrastructure | 4-7% | 1-2% | 5-9% (lower volatility) |
| Dividend Stocks | 2-4% | 4-6% | 7-10% (higher volatility) |
| Bonds | 3-5% | 0-1% | 3-6% (interest rate risk) |
Return Components Explained:
Multifamily Real Estate:
- Income from rental payments averaging 3-5% annually
- Growth from rent increases and property appreciation of 2-3% annually
- Total return expectation of 5-8% annually with significant tax advantages
Commercial Real Estate:
- Income from lease payments averaging 4-6% annually
- Growth from contractual rent escalations and value appreciation of 1-3%
- Total return expectation of 6-9% annually with sector variation
Infrastructure:
- Income from contracted payments (often government-backed) of 4-7%
- Growth from inflation adjustments and increased usage of 1-2%
- Total return expectation of 5-9% with lower volatility than real estate
A retiree investment case study showed that a portfolio with 40% allocation to income-producing real assets (rental properties, REITs, and infrastructure funds) provided 35% higher sustainable withdrawal rates compared to a traditional bond-heavy retirement portfolio, while also preserving principal more effectively.
Optimal Multi-Asset Portfolio Construction
Building a well-diversified portfolio requires thoughtful allocation across multiple dimensions:
Core-Satellite Approach
Many sophisticated investors adopt a core-satellite structure that balances market exposure with specialized opportunities.
Core Allocation (60% of portfolio):
The core provides market exposure and maintains liquidity through highly transparent, low-cost investments:
- 25% Domestic equities for broad market exposure
- 15% International equities for global diversification
- 20% Fixed income for stability and income
Satellite Allocations (40% of portfolio):
Satellite positions enhance returns, provide diversification, and manage specific risks:
Alternative Components:
- 15% Real estate (combination of REITs and direct ownership)
- 7% Private equity (growth and illiquidity premium)
- 8% Infrastructure (inflation protection and income)
- 5% Commodities (inflation hedge and crisis protection)
Specialty Components:
- 3% Sector-specific targeted thematic investments
- 2% Tactical opportunities from market dislocations
This structure provides a solid foundation while allowing for targeted exposure to specialized opportunities. The satellite allocations typically offer higher expected returns and lower correlation with traditional markets, though they are generally less liquid than core holdings.
Risk Factor Diversification
Modern portfolio construction focuses increasingly on diversifying across risk factors rather than just asset classes:
Traditional Asset Allocation Approach:
The conventional method allocates percentage weights to asset classes: 50% stocks, 30% bonds, 10% real estate, and 10% alternatives. However, this approach has critical limitations:
- Hidden concentration in economic growth factor
- Underestimation of correlation during stress
- Overemphasis on asset labels versus actual behavior
Risk Factor Allocation Approach:
A more sophisticated method focuses on exposure to underlying drivers:
| Risk Factor | Portfolio Exposure | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Economic Growth | 35% | Across multiple assets |
| Interest Rates | 20% | Fixed income and equities |
| Inflation | 15% | Real assets and TIPS |
| Credit | 10% | Corporate bonds and loans |
| Liquidity | 10% | Private investments |
| Sentiment | 10% | Momentum and volatility strategies |
Benefits of Risk Factor Approach:
- More accurate understanding of portfolio risks
- Identification of unintended concentrations
- Improved behavior during market stress
- Enhanced ability to adjust exposures based on economic outlook
This risk factor approach often reveals hidden concentrations and provides more resilient diversification across different economic environments.
Liquidity Tiering
Effective portfolio construction should organize investments by liquidity horizon:
Immediate Liquidity Tier (10-15% of portfolio):
- Purpose: Meet near-term expenses and opportunities
- Components: Cash, short-term bonds, and public equities
- Redemption Timing: Same day to T+3
- Use Cases: Emergency funds, tactical opportunities, living expenses
Intermediate Liquidity Tier (25-30% of portfolio):
- Purpose: Tactical allocation and medium-term needs
- Components: REITs, liquid alternatives, and specialty ETFs
- Redemption Timing: Weekly to quarterly
- Use Cases: Portfolio rebalancing, planned purchases, opportunistic investments
Extended Liquidity Tier (30-40% of portfolio):
- Purpose: Enhanced returns through illiquidity premium
- Components: Direct real estate, private credit, infrastructure
- Redemption Timing: Quarterly to annually with restrictions
- Use Cases: Long-term growth, income generation, diversification
Long-Term Illiquid Tier (20-30% of portfolio):
- Purpose: Maximum return potential and compounding
- Components: Private equity, development projects, venture capital
- Redemption Timing: 5-10+ year commitment periods
- Use Cases: Generational wealth building, highest return opportunities
A wealthy entrepreneur who structured their portfolio with clear liquidity tiers was able to capitalize on the 2020 market dislocation, deploying capital from their immediate and intermediate liquidity buckets while maintaining their strategic allocation to illiquid investments.
Strategic Implementation for Different Investor Types
Implementation strategies should vary based on investor characteristics and objectives:
Individual Investors
High Net Worth Individual Implementation:
Primary Investment Vehicles:
- Public Markets: ETFs, mutual funds, and individual securities
- Real Estate: Direct ownership, private partnerships, and REITs
- Alternatives: Hedge funds, private equity funds, and specialized platforms
- Physical Assets: Investment properties, collectibles, and precious metals
Implementation Challenges:
- Accredited investor requirements for certain opportunities
- Minimum investment thresholds for private investments
- Portfolio management complexity across multiple platforms
Recommended Approach: Core ETF portfolio complemented by direct real assets
Mass Affluent Investor Implementation:
Primary Investment Vehicles:
- Public Markets: Index funds, ETFs, and low-cost mutual funds
- Real Estate: REITs, fractional ownership platforms, and primary residence
- Alternatives: Interval funds, alts ETFs, and crowdfunding platforms
- Physical Assets: Residential real estate and small precious metals allocation
Implementation Challenges:
- Access limitations to institutional-quality investments
- Higher relative costs for smaller allocation sizes
- Complexity of direct ownership with limited resources
Recommended Approach: Model portfolios with liquid alternatives and residential real estate
Beginning Investor Implementation:
Primary Investment Vehicles:
- Public Markets: Broad index ETFs and target-date funds
- Real Estate: REIT ETFs and tokenized real estate platforms
- Alternatives: Publicly traded alternative managers and commodity ETFs
- Physical Assets: Fractional real estate and small precious metals
Implementation Challenges:
- Limited investment capital requiring prioritization
- Need for liquidity limits alternative allocations
- Educational gap regarding alternative investments
Recommended Approach: Dollar-cost averaging into diversified ETFs with REIT component
Institutional Investors
Pension Funds:
Typical Allocation:
- 50-60% Traditional stocks and bonds
- 10-15% Real estate (direct and funds)
- 20-30% Alternatives across private markets
- 5-10% Inflation hedges (TIPS, commodities, infrastructure)
Implementation Approach: Direct investment team with external manager selection
Endowments:
Typical Allocation:
- 30-40% Traditional stocks and bonds
- 10-20% Real estate (direct and funds)
- 30-40% Extensive private markets alternatives
- 5-15% Natural resources and real assets
Implementation Approach: Yale model with long time horizon emphasis
Insurance Companies:
Typical Allocation:
- 60-70% Fixed income focus
- 5-10% Income-generating real estate
- 10-20% Yield-focused private credit
- 5-10% Infrastructure and floating rate
Implementation Approach: Liability-matched investing with yield enhancement
Case Studies: Successful Multi-Asset Strategies
Let's examine real-world examples of successful multi-asset diversification:
Family Office: Generational Wealth Preservation
Portfolio Overview: A multi-generational family office with $250M in assets seeking long-term preservation with moderate growth.
Strategic Approach:
- Core allocation to global equities and high-quality fixed income (45%)
- Significant direct real estate portfolio focused on multifamily and industrial (25%)
- Private equity and credit allocations to family-aligned sectors (15%)
- Specialized physical assets including farmland and timberland (10%)
- Tactical allocation for opportunistic investments (5%)
Implementation:
- Direct ownership of core real estate assets in primary markets
- Complementary REIT allocations for specialized sectors
- Club deals with similar family offices for private equity
- Generational education program to maintain investment philosophy
Results:
- 7.2% annualized return over 15 years (4.9% real return)
- Weathered 2008 financial crisis with 14% maximum drawdown
- Successfully navigated 2021-2022 inflation spike with positive real returns
- Complete preservation of purchasing power across three generations
Endowment: The "Yale Model" Adaptation
Portfolio Overview: A university endowment with $1.2B in assets seeking to support institutional spending while growing corpus.
Strategic Approach:
- Limited allocation to traditional stocks and bonds (30%)
- Substantial private equity program across stages (25%)
- Real assets portfolio spanning real estate, infrastructure, and natural resources (25%)
- Absolute return strategies for uncorrelated returns (15%)
- Venture capital allocation to early-stage innovation (5%)
Implementation:
- Extensive network of external managers with specialized expertise
- Direct co-investment program alongside managers in high-conviction opportunities
- Separate inflation-hedging allocation within physical asset portfolio
- Long investment horizons with limited liquidity requirements
Results:
- 9.7% annualized returns over 20 years
- Spending support maintained even through market downturns
- 40% growth in inflation-adjusted corpus despite increasing withdrawals
- Consistent first-quartile performance versus peer endowments
Retirement Investor: Enhanced Income Strategy
Portfolio Overview: A retired couple with $3.5M in investable assets seeking income with inflation protection.
Strategic Approach:
- Balanced foundation of dividend stocks and bonds (50%)
- Income-producing real estate through direct ownership and REITs (25%)
- Infrastructure and utility allocations for stable yields (15%)
- Precious metals and inflation-protected securities (5%)
- Cash reserves for opportunities and needs (5%)
Implementation:
- Direct ownership of three rental properties in growing markets
- Publicly traded infrastructure and utility stocks for liquidity
- Dividend ETFs focused on dividend growth rather than highest yield
- Short and intermediate-term bond ladder for liquidity and reinvestment
Results:
- Sustainable 4.2% withdrawal rate maintained over 12 years
- Income grown at inflation +1% throughout retirement
- Portfolio value preservation in real terms despite withdrawals
- Successful navigation of multiple interest rate cycles
Measuring Portfolio Success
How should investors measure the effectiveness of their diversification strategy? Look beyond simple returns to these key metrics:
Essential Performance Metrics:
- Risk-Adjusted Returns: Sharpe and Sortino ratios to assess return per unit of risk
- Maximum Drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline experienced
- Correlation Matrix: How assets move in relation to each other, particularly during stress
- Real Returns: Performance after accounting for inflation
- Income Reliability: Consistency and growth of portfolio-generated income
Leading wealth managers develop comprehensive dashboards to track these metrics:

Implementation Challenges and Solutions
Implementing a multi-asset strategy presents several challenges:
Access and Minimums
High Minimum Investments:
- Challenge: Many private investments require $250k+ minimums
- Solutions:
- Feeder funds and aggregation vehicles
- Interval funds with lower minimums
- Fractional ownership platforms for real estate
Accreditation Requirements:
- Challenge: Regulatory restrictions for non-accredited investors
- Solutions:
- Publicly traded alternatives like BDCs and interval funds
- Registered products providing alternative exposure
- Focus on accessible physical assets like REITs
Management Complexity
Administrative Burden:
- Challenge: Multiple platforms, accounts, statements, and tax documents
- Solutions:
- Consolidated reporting software
- Outsourced family office services
- Unified managed account platforms
Performance Evaluation:
- Challenge: Inconsistent valuation methodologies across asset types
- Solutions:
- Standardized performance measurement frameworks
- Regular third-party valuations for private assets
- Focus on cash flow metrics for certain assets
Expertise Requirements:
- Challenge: Specialized knowledge needed across multiple domains
- Solutions:
- Education and continuous learning programs
- Trusted advisor network with specialized expertise
- Technology platforms with built-in guidance
Liquidity Management
Balancing Act:
- Challenge: Capturing illiquidity premiums while maintaining access to capital
- Solutions:
- Structured liquidity tiers with dedicated allocations
- Laddered maturity approach for investments
- Line of credit secured by illiquid assets
Unexpected Needs:
- Challenge: Forced liquidation during inopportune market conditions
- Solutions:
- Cash reserve policy based on spending needs
- Strategic liquidation hierarchy for emergencies
- Insurance strategies to reduce contingent cash needs
Future Trends in Multi-Asset Investing
Several emerging trends are reshaping the landscape of multi-asset investing:
Democratization of Alternative Assets
Driving Forces:
- Technological innovations in investment platforms
- Regulatory changes expanding access
- Investor demand for private market exposure
Emerging Solutions:
- Tokenization: Blockchain-based fractional ownership of assets
- Interval Funds: Registered funds with periodic liquidity
- Alts Platforms: Specialized marketplaces for alternative investments
- Retail Private Equity: Publicly accessible private equity strategies
Impact: Broader investor access to previously institutional-only asset classes
Integration of Public and Private Markets
Evolution Timeline:
- Traditional: Strict separation between public and private investments
- Current: Increasing overlap and strategic combinations
- Future: Seamless strategies spanning public-private spectrum
Hybrid Investment Vehicles:
- Evergreen Funds: Open-ended private market exposure
- Crossover Funds: Invest across public and private phases
- Listed Private Assets: Publicly traded shares of private portfolios
Investor Benefits: More flexible liquidity profiles and broader opportunity set
ESG and Impact Integration
Investor Motivations:
- Alignment of investments with values
- Risk mitigation through sustainability focus
- Capturing opportunities in transition to sustainable economy
Multi-Asset Implementation:
- Public Markets: Screened ETFs and active engagement strategies
- Real Estate: Green buildings and affordable housing
- Infrastructure: Renewable energy and sustainable transportation
- Private Equity: Impact-focused investments in solution providers
Measurement Frameworks: Standardizing impact metrics across asset classes
Conclusion: Building Your Diversified Portfolio
Asset diversification across both traditional and physical assets has evolved from a simple concept to a sophisticated practice essential for long-term investment success. By thoughtfully combining exposure to different economic drivers, investors can create more resilient portfolios with enhanced return potential and reduced volatility.
As markets continue to evolve, consider these key principles when building your diversified multi-asset portfolio:
-
Think Beyond Traditional Categories: Focus on underlying risk factors and economic exposures rather than asset class labels
-
Embrace Physical Assets: Incorporate real estate, infrastructure, and other tangible investments for inflation protection and reduced correlation
-
Match Liquidity to Needs: Structure your portfolio with clear liquidity tiers aligned with your time horizon and cash flow requirements
-
Maintain Discipline: Established rebalancing processes to maintain your strategic allocation through market cycles
-
Evolve Thoughtfully: Incorporate new opportunities and investment vehicles as they become accessible, while maintaining core principles
By following these guidelines, investors of all sizes can implement sophisticated multi-asset strategies that were once available only to the largest institutions.
Ready to enhance your investment diversification? Contact our advisors to discuss how a personalized multi-asset strategy can help you achieve your financial objectives in today's complex investment landscape.